Tech News
Rigid work models won’t survive AI. Here’s what will

Artificial intelligence, automation, and digital connectivity are fundamentally reshaping how work is organized. Despite this, corporate workplaces, due to how they’re structured, are struggling to keep up.
According to EY, the average lifespan of an S&P 500 company has plummeted from over 65 years in the 1940s to just 15 years today. The speed of technological progress is outpacing the adaptability of our work systems, many of which are designed for a slower and more predictable era. Businesses that once thrived on longevity and stability must now embrace agility, continuous learning, and dynamic workforce models.
As newly emerging technologies like AI continue to evolve, human-AI collaboration, sustainability, and deeper integration of technology with human ingenuity will become increasingly important in the workforce. The mandate for business leaders is clear: Organizations must move beyond outdated hierarchies and rethink work structures in a way that empowers both people and machines.
The industrial revolution moved slowly. This one won’t
The integration of AI-based technologies is already influencing the work humans do and how they do it. Mustafa Suleyman, the CEO of Microsoft AI, coined the term “artificial capable intelligence” (ACI), which is the point at which AI can solve complex problems without human input. Within the next couple of years, we are likely to see the rise of AI agent swarms and multiple autonomous systems working together to achieve successful outcomes.
This doesn’t mean humans will become obsolete, but the role of human oversight is shifting from task execution to resource allocation and strategy. Dan Shipper, CEO of Every, calls this shift a move from the knowledge economy to the allocation economy, which he defines as “how well you can allocate and manage the resources to get work done.” Rather than simply managing work, people will need to learn how to best allocate work to AI and then manage and audit it. This is a new way to think about work for the majority of workers today.
Unfortunately, the cumbersome way today’s corporations are structured makes it difficult for them to continuously upskill their workforces in lockstep with technology advancements. Organizations are wired for efficiency and scalability, not for learning and adaptability. And, the current labor market dynamics are only exacerbating this AI skills challenge.
A radically new labor market
The U.S. labor market is undergoing a profound transformation, reshaping the way we think about work and employment. While job growth remains steady, there are significant shifts in workforce participation and hiring practices. Labor force participation is lagging behind pre-pandemic levels, with millions of working-age adults choosing not to actively engage in the workforce. Many of these individuals have left due to skill mismatches, lack of training opportunities, or changing priorities in the wake of the pandemic.
Partly as a result, businesses are increasingly facing a skills gap that’s compounded by the number of job openings outpacing the available talent. In fact, there are currently 9 million job openings in the U.S., but the number of unemployed individuals actively seeking work remains much lower, highlighting the disconnect between employer needs and workforce availability.
This shift is further driven by the rise of freelance and contingent work, which is rapidly becoming a mainstream career choice. Today, nearly 40% of the U.S. workforce is engaged in contract or freelance work, a number that is expected to reach 50% by 2050. This trend is especially pronounced among younger generations, such as Gen Z, who are increasingly gravitating toward portfolio careers instead of traditional full-time roles. At the same time, the hiring process has become more impersonal, with automation and ghosting trends leaving job seekers frustrated. As businesses struggle to navigate these dynamics, workforce participation continues to evolve in ways that challenge both employers and employees alike, demanding a new approach to talent acquisition and retention.
Skills-driven guilds as the future of work
As AI adoption accelerates, traditional corporate training programs are proving too slow and misaligned with real-world demands. Meanwhile, companies still rely on full-time employment models that fail to support today’s increasingly independent and project-based workforce.
The solution? Skills-driven guilds (SDGs).
SDGs function as modern, tech-enabled talent ecosystems that bring together workers, businesses, and educational resources into specialized communities. Unlike traditional hiring, SDGs provide a structured yet flexible career framework, where professionals continuously upskill and connect with new opportunities, while businesses tap into expert talent exactly when they need it.
Upwork’s recent qualitative research with Wikistrat invited a group of 20 experts to forecast how work structures are likely to evolve through 2030. One area of consensus involved the notion that companies will have fewer full-time employees and more freelancers who they hire for specific skills and limited projects. However, the experts acknowledged that assembling these teams will require the development of new talent management systems that are low-friction, trustworthy, and transparent. As work becomes more dynamic and project-based, rigid corporate structures are failing to support workers or businesses effectively.
How skills-driven guilds work in practice
A skills-driven guild operates much like a work marketplace, but with built-in training, trust, and ongoing engagement. Today, platforms like Upwork already function as proto-SDGs by offering businesses access to specialized freelance talent on demand.
Here’s what makes SDGs different:
- Verified, high-quality talent: Workers in SDGs demonstrate their expertise through past projects, AI-driven assessments, and peer reviews—not just traditional degrees or résumés.
- Continuous learning and upskilling: SDGs offer a structured learning path, where professionals train in high-demand skills alongside real-world work, often in partnership with companies or training providers.
- Community-driven knowledge sharing: Members gain access to mentorship, career resources, and industry connections, similar to traditional professional guilds—but without being tied to a single employer.
- Faster hiring and reduced friction: Businesses instantly match with the right professionals and integrate them into projects seamlessly, cutting down the time and cost of hiring.
Who pays for a guild? Why would companies invest?
The economics of SDGs work differently than traditional employment. Instead of long-term contracts and overhead costs, businesses pay for access to curated, highly skilled talent only when needed. A couple different models could include:
- Enterprise-sponsored guilds: Large organizations could fund guilds in exchange for preferred access to top professionals in AI, engineering, or creative fields.
- Freelancer-driven guilds: Independent professionals contribute to a guild for networking, training, and job opportunities, similar to professional associations.
Companies that invest in SDGs not only secure a pipeline of skilled workers but also gain a strategic advantage—future-proofing their workforce against technological disruptions while maintaining agility in a rapidly evolving market.
Building an AI-empowered workforce that thrives
The shift toward more flexible, skills-driven employment is already underway. Forward-thinking organizations are embracing fractional executive roles, AI-assisted workforce augmentation, and talent marketplaces to stay competitive. Those who invest in skills-driven guilds will not only attract the best talent but also future-proof their workforce for decades to come.
The organizations that thrive will be those that see skilling as an ongoing journey, not a one-time event. Workers who continuously adapt and upskill will lead the next wave of innovation, ensuring economic resilience in an era of rapid disruption.
The question is no longer if the traditional corporation will evolve, but how quickly leaders are willing to build a skills-based, networked future of work.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Tech News
Sequoia Capital to cut policy team and shutter Washington, D.C. office just as the tech industry increases its visibility under Trump

Sequoia Capital, one of Silicon Valley’s most prominent venture capital firms, is laying off its Washington, D.C.-based policy team and shuttering its office there, just as some tech-related companies try to increase their visibility in the U.S. capital after President Trump’s re-election.
The changes will take effect at the end of March and impact three full-time employees as well as policy fellows who worked with the firm. Sequoia confirmed the layoff while two sources familiar with the matter who requested anonymity because the topic is sensitive, said that the firm would close its Washington office.
Sequoia says it had set up its small policy team five years ago—during the first Trump Administration—to advise its investment team and portfolio companies on regulatory issues, deepen its knowledge of the policy landscape, and strengthen its connections with global policymakers, experts, and think tanks. Don Vieira, who had held senior national security positions at the Department of Justice and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, opened the office, according to his LinkedIn. Vieria will leave the firm as part of the changes. He did not respond to requests for comment.
“Thanks to [the policy group’s] strategic guidance and efforts, Sequoia is now well-positioned to carry these relationships in the U.S. and Europe forward,” a Sequoia spokesperson said. “To that end, we are sunsetting the dedicated policy function and closing our D.C. office at the end of March. We are grateful to the team for their contributions and impact.”
The changes at Sequoia are in contrast to tech companies that have been increasing their visibility in Washington, D.C. since President Trump’s re-election. Meta in January hired Joel Kaplan, former deputy chief of staff to former President George W. Bush, to head its global policy team and CEO Mark Zuckerburg has visited Trump at the White House and Mar-a-Lago.
Some other venture capital firms have been beefing up their presence in Washington, D.C. to help portfolio companies that operate in highly regulated or political industries like defense, crypto, or AI. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, for example, which has had several of its partners take official or advisory positions in the White House, recently hired Patrick McHenry, the former North Carolina congressman, and Matt Cronin, former Chief Investigative Counsel and Deputy General Counsel for the U.S. House Select Committee on Strategic Competition, as senior advisors to the firm. Last fall, before the election, General Catalyst launched what it calls the “General Catalyst Institute” to influence AI, healthcare, defense and intelligence, manufacturing, and energy policy.
Sequoia Capital has historically remained politically neutral as a firm, even though many of its partners individually express political views or make large donations to presidential candidates. Top partner Roelof Botha said last summer that he is not registered with either political party, but that he is “more focused on the policies that will drive entrepreneurship, job creation, and making sure that the United States stays ahead.”
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Tech News
Is Google’s $32 billion Wiz acquisition a one-off—or a sign that Big Tech M&A is back?

Google plans to acquire cybersecurity company Wiz for $32 billion in the search giant’s largest-ever acquisition.
In a vacuum, that’s stunning, but it’s even more so in context. The last couple years have been an exhaustingly stalled time for venture capital-backed companies looking for a big ticket exit. Under former Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan, acquisitions by Big Tech became a hazy exit lane because of antitrust concerns. Meanwhile, economic considerations and geopolitical pressures mostly froze the IPO market.
Cybersecurity was a sector that saw some acquisitions and even the occasional IPO amid broader industry consolidation (Wiz itself did a number of acquisitions in 2024, including Dazz and Gem Security). At the same time, Wiz’s fortunes have risen in tandem with the increasing importance of cybersecurity across the global economy—as cyberattacks increased, so has investment in cybersecurity companies.
In short, Wiz, founded about five years ago, is both riding the cybersecurity and cloud adoption waves and has simultaneously defied the exit odds. The blockbuster deal, by extension, presents more questions than answers for the broader landscape.
The first question is perhaps the most obvious: Is Big Tech M&A back? During her tenure, Khan actively blocked Big Tech deals large and small, from Meta’s acquisition of VR company Within (deal value was reported at $400 million) to Microsoft’s $69 billion mega-deal for Activision Blizzard. Under the Trump administration, is it now open season for major deals? Or will another FTC-sized hammer drop?
This leads implicitly to a second question: Is Wiz a one-off? There are certainly signs the broader environment for tech is warming, especially given Klarna and CoreWeave’s recent IPO filings in quick succession. And Rubrik’s IPO last year and a steady stream of smaller intra-industry cybersecurity deals proves that cybersecurity is still hot.
But here is the situation where Wiz is fundamentally a one-off—that other cybersecurity companies now look at Wiz and have higher expectations of what an exit might look like, expectations prospective buyers aren’t willing to meet. In other words, Wiz isn’t the bellwether for the industry so much as an incredibly successful anomaly.
In that sense, Wiz’s high-flying outcome presents more questions than answers for the broader ecosystem—for now.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Tech News
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang called GTC a Super Bowl where there are no losers — then he tackled concerns about China’s DeepSeek

- Jensen Huang reaffirmed Nvidia’s starring role in the AI industry during a keynote address at Nvidia’s annual GTC conference on Tuesday. Through its new open-source software, Huang showed how Nvidia can ramp up DeepSeek R1’s efficiency 30-fold. Yet, while he spoke, Nvidia’s stock price dropped more than 3%—after the company announced its GPU timelines.
Clad in his signature black leather, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang took center stage at Nvidia GTC on Tuesday, defending the chip maker’s dominance in the industry and touting the impact it could have on DeepSeek.
The event drew more than 25,000 people to the SAP Center’s National Hockey League arena, and Huang opened the keynote by launching t-shirts into the crowd and coronating this year’s GTC the “Super Bowl of AI.”
“The only difference is everybody wins at this Super Bowl, everybody’s a winner,” he joked. And like the Super Bowl, there were GTC watch parties and packed crowds to get a glimpse of Huang on stage.
With his address, Huang sought to dispel any uneasiness around AI investment, and said discussion about lower spending does not concern Nvidia. In January, apprehension engulfed the chip maker after it lost $589 billion in market cap in a single day after Chinese AI reasoning model Deepseek R1 claimed to operate at a fraction of the cost.
While large language models offer foundational knowledge, reasoning models offer more complex, analytical responses. Using the company’s new open source software Nvidia Dynamo, Huang said the tech giant’s Blackwell chips will be able to make DeepSeek R1 30 times faster. He then played a video demonstrating for the crowd how it could be done.
“Dynamo can capture that benefit and deliver 30 times more performance in the same number of GPUs in the same architecture for reasoning models like DeepSeek,” said Ian Buck, vice president and general manager of Nvidia’s hyperscale and HPC computing business.
From there, Huang’s keynote covered everything from the chip maker’s plans to roll out its newest chips— Blackwell Ultra later this year, Vera Rubin in 2026, and Feynman in 2027.
“We have an annual rhythm of roadmaps that has been laid out for you,” Huang said.
While Nvidia’s announced its strategic runway for years to come, that wasn’t enough to stop the stock’s slide. The chip maker’s share price tumbled 3.4% Tuesday.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
-
Tech News3 months ago
How Costco’s formula for reaching uncertain consumers is pushing shares past $1,000 to all-time highs
-
Tech News3 months ago
Luigi Mangione hires top lawyer—whose husband is representing Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs
-
Tech News3 months ago
Lego bricks have won over adults, growing its $10 billion toy market foothold—and there’s more to come
-
Tech News3 months ago
Quentin Tarantino thinks movies are still better than TV shows like Yellowstone
-
Tech News3 months ago
Inside the FOMC: Boston Fed President Susan Collins on changing her mind, teamwork, and the alchemy behind the base rate
-
Tech News3 months ago
Nancy Pelosi has hip replacement surgery at a US military hospital in Germany after falling at Battle of the Bulge ceremony
-
Tech News3 months ago
Trump and members of Congress want drones shot down while more are spotted near military facilities
-
Tech News3 months ago
Hundreds of OpenAI’s current and ex-employees are about to get a huge payday by cashing out up to $10 million each in a private stock sale