Tech News
End of an era: Can Europe protect itself without the U.S.?

Barely a month ago, a phone call between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin sent an unmistakable message across the Atlantic: the United States may not be there forever to keep Europe safe from an aggressive Russia.
By the time the pair spoke again this week, a whirlwind of diplomacy had seen Europe juggle alliances and rewrite long-held rules — with a show of assertiveness not always associated with the Old Continent.
“The advent of the Trump administration has given history a shove, and concentrated minds about what needs to be done,” summed up Ian Lesser of the German Marshall Fund think tank.
Here is a look at the shifts taking place — and what might lie ahead — as the 27-nation European Union holds on Thursday its third summit in six weeks aimed at ramping up its defences.
‘New actors’
From Brussels to Paris to London and back to Brussels — the frenzy of diplomacy sparked by Trump’s outreach to Moscow over Ukraine has blurred a number of lines.
Back-to-back meetings have involved sub-groups of countries from in and outside the EU, and for the bloc’s formal talks, “likeminded” partners from Britain to Canada have been kept in the loop, as they will be again this week.
More often than not, NATO’s secretary general has joined in, intent on acting as a bridge with the new US administration.
The shifting formats highlight the challenge posed by Hungary’s Viktor Orban, who is friendly to both Trump and Russia and has repeatedly held up unanimous EU action on Ukraine.
For the second time running, leaders expect to settle in Brussels on a 26-nation statement to sidestep what a senior EU official termed the “strategic divergence” with Orban over the conflict.
From big tent to close-knit huddle, the flexibility also reflects the shape of the “coalition of the willing” emerging around Ukraine, and the complexities of bolstering Europe’s defences longer-term.
“It’s clear that a Europe that takes defence, not just more seriously, but more autonomously, is going to want to include new actors including Britain, Norway but also Turkey,” said Lesser, who also sees a chance of a “stronger European pole” within NATO emerging in times ahead.
Old friends
Britain’s move back towards Europe is one of the most striking consequences of America’s disengagement, even as a formal bid to rekindle ties post-Brexit showed signs of floundering.
Old gripes were bubbling up again between London and some European capitals accusing it of cherry-picking in its “reset” push — and EU insiders still believe any broad agreement will be difficult.
But British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has emerged as a key player in European efforts to keep the United States engaged, secure a hoped-for ceasefire in Ukraine, and get serious about the continent’s own security.
“This has really helped turn a page with the United Kingdom,” said Camille Grand, policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations. “Both sides are realising that, when it comes down to it, we can come together around the things that truly matter.”
In the short term, Grand still predicts a tussle over “who gets access to Europe’s cash for rearmament”, with “buy European” provisions baked into a 150-billion-euro ($163-billion) loan programme presented this week.
But Britain could come in on the project if it signs a security deal with the EU.
And with Starmer and France’s Emmanuel Macron working in lockstep on a Ukraine coalition, that bolsters the case of those seeking closer EU-UK cooperation on security at least.
Rules be damned?
The prospect of losing US security protection has also triggered a minor earthquake involving the EU’s sacrosanct budget deficit rules.
Brussels now wants the fiscal rules put on hold for four years to unlock potential defence spending worth 650 billion euros, to nods from countries who would once have howled in protest.
Calls to go further and overhaul those same rules have emanated from historically reluctant spender Germany — itself tearing up decades of precedent by backing a defence spending “bazooka” pushed by leader-in-waiting Friedrich Merz.
More radical still, Merz has called for talks with France and Britain on a shared nuclear deterrent, while Poland’s Donald Tusk has shown interest in accessing atomic weapons.
“Many taboos have been shattered in recent weeks,” said Lesser, on everything from deterrence to finance.
The caveat? Influential Germany and the Netherlands remain firmly opposed to bigger EU joint borrowing on the scale deployed to overcome the Covid pandemic.
“Right now, it’s not there,” the bloc’s top diplomat Kaja Kallas acknowledged Wednesday. “But is it completely off the table? I don’t think so.”
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Tech News
‘We won’t be silent’ — Teachers vow legal challenges after Trump moves to slash Department of Education

- President Donald Trump signed an executive order to crack open the Department of Education on Thursday. The American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association condemned the move, and have promised lawsuits. Earlier this month, the department laid off nearly half of its staff.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order that would dissolve the U.S. Department of Education (DOE). While the agency cannot be shuttered without congressional approval, Trump signed the order saying that it would “begin eliminating the federal Department of Education once and for all.”
The order states taxpayers spend $60 billion annually on federal school funding marshalled and distributed by the DOE even though the agency “does not educate anyone.” In the order, Trump claimed its closure would help children and families “escape a system that is failing them.” Trump directed Secretary of Education Linda McMahon to turn education authority over to states and local communities while ensuring “uninterrupted delivery of services, programs, and benefits on which Americans rely.” It also directs McMahon to terminate programs promoting “gender ideology,” and withdraw funding from programs and activities that illegally discriminate based on diversity, equity, and inclusion. The order claimed that the DOE maintains a public relations office with 80 staff members at a cost of $10 million a year.
In a quick rebuke, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten said the 1.7-million member union would, “see you in court,” in a statement to Fortune.
The DOE is charged with oversight of the country’s $1.6 trillion federal student loan fund, and oversees and sets school policies for early childhood, primary, and secondary schools through financial funding and monitoring. The agency’s remit includes ensuring equal access to education for all students including those from low-income, disabled, and non-native English speaking homes. Established in 1979, the DOE supervises 50 million students in public school systems across the country.
Earlier this month under the direction of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, the DOE laid off 2,183 employees, nearly half of its January workforce of more than 4,100.
“Now, Trump is at it again with his latest effort to gut the Department of Education programs that support every student across the nation,” National Education Association President Becky Pringle said in a statement to Fortune.
Pringle claimed cuts to the DOE would increase class sizes, cut job training programs, eliminate special education for those with disabilities, axe civil rights protections and increase college tuition prices, putting it “out of reach for middle class families.”
“We won’t be silent as anti-public education politicians try to steal opportunities from our students, our families, and our communities to pay for tax cuts for billionaires,” Pringle said.
Republican lawmakers have long tried to terminate the department since the 1980s, but in recent years that campaign has garnered traction as tensions mounted after federal mandates and policies in response to COVID-19.
“In moving forward with this, Trump is ignoring what parents and educators know is right for our students,” Pringle said.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Tech News
‘We won’t be silent’ — Teachers vow legal challenges after Trump moves to slash Department of Education

- President Donald Trump signed an executive order to crack open the Department of Education on Thursday. The American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association condemned the move, and have promised lawsuits. Earlier this month, the department laid off nearly half of its staff.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order that would dissolve the U.S. Department of Education (DOE). While the agency cannot be shuttered without congressional approval, Trump signed the order saying that it would “begin eliminating the federal Department of Education once and for all.”
The order states taxpayers spend $60 billion annually on federal school funding marshalled and distributed by the DOE even though the agency “does not educate anyone.” In the order, Trump claimed its closure would help children and families “escape a system that is failing them.” Trump directed Secretary of Education Linda McMahon to turn education authority over to states and local communities while ensuring “uninterrupted delivery of services, programs, and benefits on which Americans rely.” It also directs McMahon to terminate programs promoting “gender ideology,” and withdraw funding from programs and activities that illegally discriminate based on diversity, equity, and inclusion. The order claimed that the DOE maintains a public relations office with 80 staff members at a cost of $10 million a year.
In a quick rebuke, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten said the 1.7-million member union would, “see you in court,” in a statement to Fortune.
The DOE is charged with oversight of the country’s $1.6 trillion federal student loan fund, and oversees and sets school policies for early childhood, primary, and secondary schools through financial funding and monitoring. The agency’s remit includes ensuring equal access to education for all students including those from low-income, disabled, and non-native English speaking homes. Established in 1979, the DOE supervises 50 million students in public school systems across the country.
Earlier this month under the direction of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, the DOE laid off 2,183 employees, nearly half of its January workforce of more than 4,100.
“Now, Trump is at it again with his latest effort to gut the Department of Education programs that support every student across the nation,” National Education Association President Becky Pringle said in a statement to Fortune.
Pringle claimed cuts to the DOE would increase class sizes, cut job training programs, eliminate special education for those with disabilities, axe civil rights protections and increase college tuition prices, putting it “out of reach for middle class families.”
“We won’t be silent as anti-public education politicians try to steal opportunities from our students, our families, and our communities to pay for tax cuts for billionaires,” Pringle said.
Republican lawmakers have long tried to terminate the department since the 1980s, but in recent years that campaign has garnered traction as tensions mounted after federal mandates and policies in response to COVID-19.
“In moving forward with this, Trump is ignoring what parents and educators know is right for our students,” Pringle said.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Tech News
‘We won’t be silent’ — Teachers vow legal challenges after Trump moves to slash Department of Education

- President Donald Trump signed an executive order to crack open the Department of Education on Thursday. The American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association condemned the move, and have promised lawsuits. Earlier this month, the department laid off nearly half of its staff.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order that would dissolve the U.S. Department of Education (DOE). While the agency cannot be shuttered without congressional approval, Trump signed the order saying that it would “begin eliminating the federal Department of Education once and for all.”
The order states taxpayers spend $60 billion annually on federal school funding marshalled and distributed by the DOE even though the agency “does not educate anyone.” In the order, Trump claimed its closure would help children and families “escape a system that is failing them.” Trump directed Secretary of Education Linda McMahon to turn education authority over to states and local communities while ensuring “uninterrupted delivery of services, programs, and benefits on which Americans rely.” It also directs McMahon to terminate programs promoting “gender ideology,” and withdraw funding from programs and activities that illegally discriminate based on diversity, equity, and inclusion. The order claimed that the DOE maintains a public relations office with 80 staff members at a cost of $10 million a year.
In a quick rebuke, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten said the 1.7-million member union would, “see you in court,” in a statement to Fortune.
The DOE is charged with oversight of the country’s $1.6 trillion federal student loan fund, and oversees and sets school policies for early childhood, primary, and secondary schools through financial funding and monitoring. The agency’s remit includes ensuring equal access to education for all students including those from low-income, disabled, and non-native English speaking homes. Established in 1979, the DOE supervises 50 million students in public school systems across the country.
Earlier this month under the direction of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, the DOE laid off 2,183 employees, nearly half of its January workforce of more than 4,100.
“Now, Trump is at it again with his latest effort to gut the Department of Education programs that support every student across the nation,” National Education Association President Becky Pringle said in a statement to Fortune.
Pringle claimed cuts to the DOE would increase class sizes, cut job training programs, eliminate special education for those with disabilities, axe civil rights protections and increase college tuition prices, putting it “out of reach for middle class families.”
“We won’t be silent as anti-public education politicians try to steal opportunities from our students, our families, and our communities to pay for tax cuts for billionaires,” Pringle said.
Republican lawmakers have long tried to terminate the department since the 1980s, but in recent years that campaign has garnered traction as tensions mounted after federal mandates and policies in response to COVID-19.
“In moving forward with this, Trump is ignoring what parents and educators know is right for our students,” Pringle said.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
-
Tech News3 months ago
How Costco’s formula for reaching uncertain consumers is pushing shares past $1,000 to all-time highs
-
Tech News3 months ago
Luigi Mangione hires top lawyer—whose husband is representing Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs
-
Tech News3 months ago
Lego bricks have won over adults, growing its $10 billion toy market foothold—and there’s more to come
-
Tech News3 months ago
Quentin Tarantino thinks movies are still better than TV shows like Yellowstone
-
Tech News3 months ago
Inside the FOMC: Boston Fed President Susan Collins on changing her mind, teamwork, and the alchemy behind the base rate
-
Tech News3 months ago
Nancy Pelosi has hip replacement surgery at a US military hospital in Germany after falling at Battle of the Bulge ceremony
-
Tech News3 months ago
Trump and members of Congress want drones shot down while more are spotted near military facilities
-
Tech News3 months ago
Hundreds of OpenAI’s current and ex-employees are about to get a huge payday by cashing out up to $10 million each in a private stock sale